CIT Analysis: Missing aspects when there is a significant CIT –

for financial stocks and crypto data – Full Landscape View #6 (Finance)

CIT = Change in Trend, an inflexion point

AC ver: 1.97

This article should be read along with the AC post:

Bitcoin – the astrology 


CIT Analysis for Aspect Hits 

Menus Icons

CIT Analysis Tabbed Menu

CIT Analysis Tabbed Menu


To get to CIS Analysis

To get to the CIT Analysis form tap here

Missing CIT aspects

it can be seen from the above post that not all significant CIT’s have a corresponding/associated aspect to the radix. It was found that aspects to the radical BTC MC did not seem to be associated with any significant hits. However, this article will show that this is not the case and that aspects the MC are probably significant. Or at least to a point near the current MC long position.

The question is: what are these supposed longitude positions of a planet that aspects these CIT’s? How are they found?

It may be possible that that the Asc and MC are inaccurate and the Missing CIT Aspect procedure/form may help to find the true positions of these points. Thus, this is a rectification method.

A suitable procedure would be as follows:

Note only transiting aspects to the radix are used to calculate the aspect hits in this example as was shown in the AC blog post.

  1. Find the most significant transiting aspecting planet to BTC (Saturn)
  2. Assign missing aspect dates – see Adding a Missing CIT Date menu icon
  3. Calculate Saturn’s (and other planets) position to CIT dates that do not have a transiting aspect from any planet (Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) to the BTC radix. ie use the Missing CIT Aspect Date table to do this.

4. Review the data to see if there are (multiple similar) longitudinal positions of Saturn (and other planets) that might indicate a point that that is significant. Please see the screenshot below.

For instance by reviewing the results of the calculation it may be that Saturn’s (and Neptune) longitudinal position for different CIT dates are at 12 degrees 02 minutes. This may indicate a sensitive degree that is associated with particular point, in this case the radical MC. It may be that there are other sensitive degree positions but they may not be so easily associated with a particular point such as the Asc or MC.

The BTC chart should then be adjusted. Further test should be applied and the chart should be reviewed for the accuracy of the new point(s).

Adding a Missing CIT Date menu icon

Add a missing CIT aspect menu icon

Add a missing CIT aspect menu icon

The Missing CIT Aspect Date table

Add missing CIT aspect Date - table

Add missing CIT aspect Date – table

When a date is successfully added:

Added Missing Aspect CIT Date

Added Missing Aspect CIT Date

Swipe left to delete a record

Locating close longitudinal positions


CIT Analysis Missing CIT aspects

CIT Analysis Missing CIT aspects

Annotated Screenshot

Missing aspects

Missing aspects


CIT’s – from, and the corresponding BTC charts

June 18th 2016 Saturn 12 01

June 18th 2016 Saturn 12 01


June 18th 2016 Aspect to MC

June 18th 2016 – Aspect to MC


Jan 6th 2018 Neptune 12 02

Jan 6th 2018 Neptune 12 02


Jan 6th 2018 Note aspect to MC

Jan 6th 2018 – aspect to MC


Another example of transiting Saturn aspect to the MC

Transiting Saturn aspect to MC

Transiting Saturn aspect to MC


A new table for the added Missing CIT dates is provided. Records are identified by the stock or crypto currency.

Missing CIT aspect dates for BTC are provided for the date range February 25th, 2014 – July 29th, 2018 – automatically provided on AC install or update.


Personal points such as the Asc, MC etc are not calculated for transits because the time used always the natal UTC time.

However, these points are calculated for Secondary Progressions, and Solar Arc directions






in Aspect HitsCIT AnalysisCryptoFinancialMissing CIT aspects
Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clear formSubmit